Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
The War On Drugs- Slave Ambient
The War On Drugs, at least on Slave
Ambient, are a hard band
to describe. Certainly their ironic, post-modern name belies
something about their music, but the actual constituent parts don't
make sense when described. The singer has a 80s Tom Petty/Bob Dylan
thing going on, and many of the songs take on a majestic/anthemic
feel which some describe as being like Bruce Springsteen though
Arcade Fire is probably a more apt (or at least more modern)
comparison. However, this is
all filtered through a shimmering, noodle-y, and guitar heavy sound.
It's not so much ambient as spacey and not so much stoned as joyful.
Slave Ambient
would already be an unqualified success simply because it features
one of the most distinctive sounding bands in recent memory pulling
off their songs with confidence far beyond their years. That it is
also one of the year's best albums further cements the sense that The
War On Drugs have achieved something truly great here. This is a
record with a sense of expanse and emotional resonance, but in a way
opposite to similarly expansive/emotional albums like Modest Mouse's
The Moon & Antarctica or
The Arcade Fire's The Suburbs.
Where those records are exhausting and draining, akin to a therapy
session or intense drug experience, Slave Ambient
is like a couple hours spent in a coffee shop catching up with an
ex-girlfriend and putting the past to rest. You leave this album
feeling rejuvenated, and that is something worth celebrating.
It's
worth emphasizing, too, that this is indeed an album and not a
ramshackle collection of songs. The instrumental interludes,
sometimes separated onto distinct tracks like 'The Animator' and
'City Reprise #12', give the album a flow and sprawl that make it
feel performed
instead of recorded.
To be sure, individual songs work well on their own, too. 'Baby
Missiles' genuinely sounds like 'Walk Of Life' by the Dire Straits
sped up a bit and filtered through some chemicals, while six minute
album centerpiece 'Your Love Is Calling My Name' is like a sampler
platter of everything this band does and does well.
Still,
to paraphrase the old saying, it's the journey that matters and not
the stops along the way. Slave
Ambient is
most impressive when taken in all at once because it manages to
sprawl and yet to be consistent; it manages to be spacey and weird
yet anthemic and immediate. This is an album's album: Slave
Ambient
is one of the most complete and satisfying releases of 2011. Like
many of the best albums of this year, it's the sound of a band coming
into their own, delivering their first great record.
Emphasis
on the “first.”
5 Poorly Drawn Stars Out Of 5
Monday, November 28, 2011
Woods- Sun and Shade
As by far the most jam oriented and
Grateful Dead influenced of their peers, Woods are also notable for
being something like leaders of the current retro influenced
psychedelic/garage rock/freak folk scene of bands like Real Estate,
White Fence, The Black Angels, Thee Oh Sees, Crystal Stilts, and
others. Between their singer's high pitched, nasally voice and a
penchant for leaving in the weird stuff and loose improvisations on
their studio albums, Woods have always struggled with the same
problem the Dead used to: how to craft excellent studio records but
leave in all the interesting bits and long song lengths from their
inspired live shows.
The band's last record, At Echo
House, saw Woods deliver a
short, focused collection of memorable tunes. It's the band's most
accessible and immediately enjoyable yet. Ironically, this also means
it's the least interesting. There's a homemade, scattershot
brilliance to even the band's debut, At Rear House,
which works because of those odd left turns and rambling instrumental
parts. The band seem to have felt the same way, since Sun
and Shade brings this stuff back
with two long tracks though the majority is still in the slightly
trippy folk/rock style they perfected on At Echo House.
This time out on the pop tunes, however, singer/guitarist Jeremy Earl
pushes his voice toward further traditional prettiness, with his
eerie, melancholic delivery on 'Wouldn't Waste' making it one of the
record's most memorable tracks.
While
all of this makes Sun and Shade
the most complete demonstration of what makes Woods such a great
band, it also makes Sun and Shade
jumbled and only partially satisfying. It's jumbled because the stark
difference between a short pop song like 'What Faces The Sheet' and
the seven minute krautrock jam 'Out of the Eye' is never resolved by
any tracks which bridge the gap between the two. Hell, it almost
feels like someone slipped a couple live tracks onto a studio album
to see if anyone would notice. Sun and Shade
is only partially satisfying because you don't get quite enough of
either side of the band's sound, and what you do get isn't always
top-of-their-game material. No pop tune here bests what they've done
before, while 'Sol y Sombra' never justifies its nine minute run
time, sounding for all the world like an aimless Animal Collective
improvisation circa Sung Tongs
or Campfire Songs.
Which
is also to say, Sun and Shade
may be jumbled and it may be only partially satisfying, but it is at
least more interesting than At Echo Lake,
which is either a good thing or bad thing depending on what you want
from this band.
3 Poorly Drawn Stars Out Of 5
Sunday, November 27, 2011
The Field- Looping State Of Mind
Like many great musicians, The Field is
defined by a series of paradoxes that don't need explanation or
resolution in order to enjoy his music. While primarily using digital
and synthetic sound sources, the music never feels robotic or
unnatural. It is technically electronic music made with computers and
the like, yet it has a blissed out atmosphere that genuinely owes
more to guitar toting dream pop and (the less noisy) shoegazer bands
than it does ambient techno or microhouse.
The final paradox is that, if listened
to back to back to back, all three of The Field's albums sound very
similar yet all have their own sense of flow and movement which makes
each unique. From Here We Go Sublime
set the standard and established the sound. It was and remains a very
special record for me, and is one of the few situations where I
deeply love an album but can't bring myself to write about it for
fear of defining what the magic is and thus losing it. Anyway, the
second album, Yesterday and Today,
is more of the same but goes to greater extremes in both rhythm and
texture. Looping State Of Mind,
meanwhile, partially tips its hat with its title. These are songs
which repeat incessantly like loops and certainly help to alter your
state of mind, yet they aren't as repetitive as they initially seem
and the blissed out/stoned atmosphere is undercut by a more heavily
rhythmic and earthy sound than you'll initially notice. The basslines
alone on the opening track will testify to that, and make a
surprisingly good foil to the dreamy washes of synthesizer which made
Sublime so unique. In
fact, Looping argues
well for turning The Field into a two or three member live unit, with
a drummer and bassist to groove along as The Field does his usual
magic.
All of
that said, Looping State Of Mind
isn't the evolutionary next step you might hope for. The Field is
still primarily mining the shimmering, minimalist ambient-techno he
patented with From Here We Go Sublime.
'It's Up There' could pass for a remix of 'Silent', though I do mean
that in the best way possible. Even in those moments where The Field
seems to be directly referencing himself, it's always through a gauzy
filter or battery of effects and loops to alter the entire dynamic of
a track. It helps that even the lengthy daydreams like 'Arpeggiated
Love' have heavier beats than From Here We Go Sublime.
This keeps your body tethered securely to the Earth even as your mind
floats away, a little trick The Field may have picked up from The
Orb, who also knew the value of mixing up persistent, deep rhythms
with spacey, stoned textures and loops.
The
Field already had legendary status based solely on From
Here We Go Sublime alone. With
Looping State Of Mind,
he has inarguably secured this position. Looping
doesn't have the sense of newness and special-ness of Sublime
and he really needs to try something new with the next one, but
sometimes consistency and modest changes are all you really need to
have a fruitful career and to produce top tier work.
5 Poorly Drawn Stars Out Of 5
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Feist- Metals
It's rare to see an artist draw close
to commercial success and mass acceptance after years of relative
obscurity and proceed to make the best, most chance-taking album of
their career. For all intents and purposes, however, that's precisely
what Metals represents. After
being known as “the chick who sings in Broken Social Scene” and
“the chick who did that 1-2-3-4 song”, Feist has at last arrived,
at least in my book, with this new record.
This
isn't to say that The Reminder
wasn't a work of finesse and ambition, or that reviews for Metals
have been overwhelmingly positive. Indeed, The Reminder
was one of those indie albums that became massively popular yet
backed up its accessible songwriting with genuine artistry. Metals,
by contrast, has had no big single to sell it to the public and it
sits at a respectable but not overwhelming 80 on Metacritic. All of
that said, I think this album's cache will only improve with time. It
feels carefully constructed and meticulously arranged such that
there's no “ah ha!” song or moment. Love, if it comes at all,
comes gradually.
The
best way I can think to explain my
reaction to this album is to say that Metals
is a record which initially promises the moon and eventually
delivers it though it still
doesn't completely satisfy. Every time I listen to it now, I can
think of no obvious flaws or problems. I can, as objectively as is
possible in this situation, say that Metals
is the best album Feist could have made. So why haven't I completely
fallen for it?
Feist,
especially on Metals,
reminds me of a less distant Tori Amos or a less depressed Cat Power,
though the best basis for comparison is PJ Harvey's Is This
Desire?, a similarly expansive
and experimental record. It's the kind of album where the artist
considers it their most personal work and greatest achievement yet it
usually ranks low on critic and fan lists. Metals
may or may not suffer a similar fate as Is This Desire?,
becoming the oblique black sheep of Feist's discography, but I do
know I share a similar attitude to both records insofar as I enjoy
them but they never became...essential
to me. Essential for the artists to make, certainly, but not vital
works that I return to again and again as the years go by. Whether or
not the artists would agree, to me albums like Is This
Desire? and Metals
feel insular and complete onto themselves. A listener is not needed,
to put it another way.
While
Is This Desire? went
for non-traditional song structures and electronic flourishes, Metals
goes for more of an ambitious orchestral/baroque singer/songwriter
sound. There may be some simple delights, such as the understated
'Bittersweet Melodies' and 'Cicadas & Gulls', which is so
stripped down compared to the rest of the record it seems like a
demo. Yet the main story of Metals is
that of reach and ambition. Layered vocal arrangements are
everywhere, with 'The Circle Married The Line' sounding downright
choral, and the general atmosphere of this album makes me imagine it
was recorded in an abandoned cathedral in remotest England on a rare
sunny day.
Metals
may not end up being her greatest critical or commercial success, but
it is undeniably the record where she announces, even if she may have
a hit single here or there, she is still an artist first and
foremost. Feist has now joined the rank of similar left-of-commercial
singer/songwriter types from the past. Metals
is not her version of, say, Rain Dogs or
Murder Ballads,
but it does demonstrate that she
is still growing and evolving.
4 Poorly Drawn Stars Out Of 5
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Weekly Whiskey Episode 32
As usual, this is going up later than I planned but...hey, it's nearly Thanksgiving, gimme a break here. After a couple food comas from the meal itself and leftovers for days, you'll forgive me.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Wild Flag- Wild Flag
Oddly enough, I sat down to begin
writing this review while (unknowingly) wearing a Sleater-Kinney
t-shirt, and I suppose that's all the context you need to understand
my anticipation for this album. The Woods
left me thinking Sleater-Kinney were heading in a new direction until
the announcement of their indefinite hiatus. Nothing short of
a true reunion will sate me, so it's best to take this review with
all of that in mind.
Wild Flag, while not a full blown
reunion, features two ex-members of Sleater-Kinney and thus is as
close as you can get without bringing Corin Tucker in. Moreover, the
self titled debut from Wild Flag sounds so similar, it might as well
be a Sleater-Kinney record in disguise. It's a hell of a lot more
like that band than Corin Tucker's solo record, to boot.
Indeed, even if there were no members
of Sleater-Kinney in Wild Flag, they are still the most obvious point
of comparison, so let's see if we
can nail down the exact records Wild Flag
sounds like. Well, to be fair, the addition of organ on some tracks
gives Wild Flag a novel, yet not outright fresh, sound. Wild Flag
really need to make more use of it if they want to distance
themselves from the past. Most of these tracks could be taken
straight from sessions for either The Woods
( 'Black Tiles' and, in particular, 'Racehorse', with its heavy
hitting low end, fuzzy production, and six minute plus runtime) or
The Hot Rock (the
tense, introspective, dark, and philosophical songs like 'Something
Came Over Me' and 'Electric Band' nod to it most of all). This isn't
a bad thing, since those are my two favorite Sleater-Kinney albums...
...but
it also leaves me wondering why I'm not listening to those albums
instead, which is a
bad thing. Despite the strength of these songs and the more
straightforward, immediate indie rock Wild Flag employs, I can never
shake the feeling that it's more appropriate to label Wild Flag a
Sleater-Kinney side project than a supergroup or band in its own
right. Make no mistake, if the organ solo on 'Future Crimes' were
played on a guitar instead, and Corin Tucker was around to provide
backing vocals, it would be a Sleater-Kinney song. I don't mean
“would sound like one”, I mean literally would be
a Sleater-Kinney song. Wild Flag is a side project or different band
in the same way Madvillain is a side project or different band for MF
DOOM, which is to say, they barely sound different despite having
some different people involved.
When
Wild Flag are cooking on all cylinders, such as during the jam in the
middle of the aforementioned 'Racehorse', there's a weird, new-ish
thrill to the band. But I said “new-ish” and not “new” for a
reason. To put it another way, Wild Flag is more like a drug you use
to help with withdrawal symptoms and not an outright cure for
addiction to Sleater-Kinney. If there were a different overall
aesthetic or even more organ dueling with the guitar, it would make
all the difference. But I digress. The notion “it's almost as good
as a proper new Sleater-Kinney album” is all I think you need to
know about Wild Flag
to determine whether or not it's for you.
4 Poorly Drawn Stars Out Of 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









